Trump hits relief at Theresa Would possibly over anti-Muslim videos however makes one huge mistake

Donald Trump has hit relief at Theresa Would possibly after she condemned him for posting anti-Muslim videos.

The US President urged the Top Minister to focal point on the UK, no longer him, after Downing Avenue branded the honest retweets « unsightly ».

But Trump tweeted at the WRONG Theresa Would possibly – as a replace sending his terrible tempered answer to a ‘Theresa Scrivener’ who had a mere six followers.

Trump wrote: « Theresa @theresamay, don’t focal point on me, focal point on the negative Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking put for the length of the United Kingdom. We’re doing honest graceful! »

Trump later corrected his tweet and sent it to the correct Theresa Would possibly.

No10 took the extra special step after the President retweeted a string of videos before every part posted by Britain First deputy leader Jayda Fransen.

One video purports to show off a “Muslim migrant” in the Netherlands assaulting a younger man on crutches. The assailant in the video used to be later arrested and is neither Muslim nor a migrant.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn condemned the retweets to Trump’s 44million followers as « abhorrent, terrible and a risk to our society » as MPs demanded the President’s Recount Consult with to Britain used to be cancelled.

The Top Minister’s suited spokesman acknowledged: “Britain First seeks to divide communities thru their spend of hateful narratives which peddle lies and stoke divisions.

“They cause peril to law abiding of us. British of us overwhelmingly reject the prejudiced rhetoric of the a ways correct which is the antithesis of the values that this country represents decency, tolerance and respect.

“It’s unsightly for the president to have performed this.”

But he confirmed plans for President Trump to assemble an suited talk over with to the UK stay in put.

Within the meantime, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defended the tweets.

She urged reporters: “These are valid threats we now have got to chat about.”

Asked if the videos had been valid, she acknowledged: “The threats are valid – no matter how you opinion at it.”

Neither of the opposite two videos posted are moderately as they look.

The video accompanying the tweet which read “Muslim destroys a statue of Virgin Mary” appears to be like to function a Wahabi Muslim cleric called Omar Gharba.

There is some confusion over where Gharba’s allegiances currently lie, however there may be improbable agreement that at the time the video used to be made in 2014, he used to be a member of the Free Syrian Military – an anti-Assad group that has enjoyed the give a enhance to of US intelligence companies.

The 1/three and most grotesque of the videos appears to be like to record a group of Islamists throwing a younger man from a rooftop.

Here is thought to were filmed one day of the overthrow of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in 2013.

Two years later, Mahmoud Ramadan , used to be convicted of atomize in reference to the incident and accomplished.

Leading Labour MP Yvette Cooper urged Parliament Fransen has « already been convicted of abominate crime in this country ».

Fransen, 31, used to be stumbled on responsible of religiously aggravated harassment in November 2016.

She used to be urged to pay virtually £2,000 in fines and charges after a court heard she wore a ‘political uniform’ and hurled abuse at a hijab-wearing Muslim woman in a park in Luton, Bedfordshire.

Ms Cooper urged the House Secretary or International Secretary to assemble a assertion « given the importance and the seriousness of getting the President of the united states giving her such an immense platform.”

Fransen used to be charged earlier this month with the spend of threatening, abusive, insulting phrases or behaviour in reference to a speech she made in Belfast over the summer season.

She may possibly be due to the face trial by magistrates in January over four counts of religiously-aggravated harassment over an incident outside a court case in Kent.