AP Intriguing: No topic denial, Pope got abuse sufferer’s letter

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Francis bought a sufferer’s letter in 2015 that graphically detailed how a priest sexually abused him and how other Chilean clergy now now not celebrated it, contradicting the pope’s fresh insistence that no victims had advance forward to denounce the conceal-up, the letter’s creator and contributors of Francis’ own intercourse- abuse commission rep told The Connected Press.

The proven fact that Francis bought the eight-internet page letter, got by the AP, challenges his insistence that he has « zero tolerance » for intercourse abuse and conceal-ups. It also calls into inquire of his acknowledged empathy with abuse survivors, compounding the most excessive crisis of his 5-twelve months papacy.

The scandal exploded closing month when Francis’ time out to South The United States used to be marred by protests over his packed with life defense of Bishop Juan Barros, who’s accused by victims of overlaying up the abuse by the Rev. Fernando Karadima. For the length of the time out, Francis callously brushed apart accusations against Barros as « slander, » reputedly unaware that victims had positioned him on the scene of Karadima’s crimes.

On the plane dwelling, confronted by an AP reporter, the pope acknowledged: « You, in all actual will, affirm me that there are victims, but I haven’t seen any, because they haven’t advance forward. »

Nonetheless contributors of the pope’s Price for the Security of Minors scream that in April 2015, they despatched a delegation to Rome specifically at hand-utter a letter to the pope about Barros. The letter from Juan Carlos Cruz detailed the abuse, kissing and fondling he says he suffered at Karadima’s palms, which he acknowledged Barros and others witnessed and now now not celebrated.

Four contributors of the commission met with Francis’ top abuse adviser, Cardinal Sean O’Malley, defined their objections to Francis’ fresh appointment of Barros as a bishop in southern Chile, and gave him the letter to utter to Francis.

« After we gave him (O’Malley) the letter for the pope, he assured us he would give it to the pope and discuss of the troubles, » then-commission member Marie Collins told the AP. « And at a later date, he assured us that that had been carried out. »

Cruz, who now lives and works in Philadelphia, heard the identical later that twelve months.

« Cardinal O’Malley known as me after the pope’s seek the advice of with here in Philadelphia and he told me, amongst other issues, that he had given the letter to the pope — in his palms, » he acknowledged in an interview at his dwelling Sunday.

Neither the Vatican nor O’Malley spoke back to more than one requests for comment.

Whereas the 2015 summit of Francis’ commission used to be known and publicized on the time, the contents of Cruz’s letter — and a photograph of Collins handing it to O’Malley — weren’t disclosed by contributors. Cruz equipped the letter, and Collins equipped the picture, after reading an AP fable that reported Francis had claimed to rep by no system heard from any Karadima victims about Barros’ habits.

The Barros affair first precipitated shockwaves in January 2015 when Francis appointed him bishop of Osorno, Chile, over the objections of the management of Chile’s bishops’ conference and many local priests and laity. They licensed as credible the testimony against Karadima, a eminent Chilean cleric who used to be sanctioned by the Vatican in 2011 for abusing minors. Barros used to be a Karadima protege, and in step with Cruz and other victims, he witnessed the abuse and did nothing.

« Holy Father, I write you this letter because I am drained of combating, of crying and struggling, » Cruz wrote in Francis’ native Spanish. « Our fable is neatly-known and there might be no must repeat it, excluding to affirm you of the dismay of getting lived this abuse and how I wanted to smash myself. »

Cruz and other survivors had for years denounced the conceal-up of Karadima’s crimes, but were brushed apart as liars by the Chilean church hierarchy and the Vatican’s own ambassador in Santiago, who refused their repeated requests to satisfy sooner than and after Barros used to be appointed.

After Francis’ feedback backing the Chilean hierarchy precipitated such an outcry in Chile, he used to be compelled closing week to pause an about-face: The Vatican introduced it used to be sending in its most revered intercourse-crimes investigator to defend testimony from Cruz and others about Barros.

Within the letter to the pope, Cruz begs for Francis to listen to him and create actual on his pledge of « zero tolerance. »

« Holy Father, or now now not it is slip ample that we suffered such massive grief and bother from the sexual and psychological abuse, but the unpleasant mistreatment we bought from our pastors is nearly worse, » he wrote.

Cruz goes on to part in train phrases the homo-eroticized nature of the circle of priests and younger boys around Karadima, the charismatic preacher whose El Bosque community within the neatly-to-pause Santiago neighborhood of Providencia produced dozens of priestly vocations and 5 bishops, in conjunction with Barros.

He described how Karadima would kiss Barros and fondle his genitals, and pause the identical with younger priests and youths, and how younger priests and seminarians would fight to sit down next to Karadima on the desk to receive his affections.

« Extra subtle and tricky used to be after we were in Karadima’s room and Juan Barros — if he wasn’t kissing Karadima — would scrutinize when Karadima would contact us — the minors — and create us kiss him, announcing: ‘Place your mouth shut to mine and stick out your tongue.’ He would stick his out and kiss us along with his tongue, » Cruz told the pope. « Juan Barros used to be a thought to all this innumerable occasions, now now not actual with me but with others as neatly. »

« Juan Barros coated up all the pieces that I even rep told you, » he added.

Barros has many occasions denied witnessing any abuse or overlaying it up. « I by no system knew anything else about, nor ever imagined, the excessive abuses which that priest dedicated against the victims, » he told the AP now now not too prolonged ago. « I even rep by no system well-liked of nor participated in such excessive, dishonest acts, and I even rep by no system been convicted by any tribunal of such issues. »

For the Osorno reliable who rep adverse Barros as their bishop, the topic is now now not so indispensable a lawful topic requiring proof or proof, as Barros used to be a younger priest on the time and now now not in a assign of abode of authority over Karadima. It be more that if Barros did now not « look » what used to be going on around him and would now not rep it problematic for a priest to kiss and fondle younger boys, he need to now not be responsible of a diocese the assign he is liable for detecting tainted sexual habits, reporting it to police and conserving kids from pedophiles cherish his mentor.

Cruz had arrived at Karadima’s community in 1980 as a vulnerable youngster, distraught after the unique demise of his father. He has acknowledged Karadima told him he shall be cherish a spiritual father to him, but in its assign sexually abused him.

In line with testimony from Cruz and other feeble contributors of the parish, the Vatican in 2011 eliminated Karadima from ministry and sentenced him to a lifetime of « penance and prayer » for his crimes. Now 87, he lives in a dwelling for aged priests in Santiago; he hasn’t commented on the scandal and the dwelling has declined to catch calls or visits from the guidelines media.

The victims also testified to Chilean prosecutors, who opened an investigation into Karadima after they went public with their accusations in 2010. Chilean prosecutors needed to fall charges because too indispensable time had handed, but the assume working the case stressed that it wasn’t for lack of proof.

Whereas the victims’ testimony used to be deemed credible by every Vatican and Chilean prosecutors, the local church hierarchy clearly did now not assume them, which might presumably well rep influenced Francis’ behold. Cardinal Francisco Javier Errazuriz has acknowledged he did now not assume the victims on the beginning and shelved an investigation. He used to be compelled to reopen it after the victims went public.

He’s now one of many Argentine pope’s key cardinal advisers.

By the time he at closing got his letter into the pope’s palms in 2015, Cruz had already despatched versions to many folks, and had tried for months to bag an appointment with the Vatican ambassador. The embassy’s Dec. 15, 2014, email to Cruz — a month sooner than Barros used to be appointed — used to be immediate and to the point:

« The apostolic nunciature has bought the message you emailed Dec. 7 to the apostolic nuncio, » it be taught, « and on the identical time communicates that your inquire of has been met with an substandard response. »

One might presumably argue that Francis did now not hear to Cruz’s letter, since he receives 1000’s of letters each day from reliable around the arena. He can’t presumably be taught them all, indispensable much less have in mind the contents years later. He might presumably well were drained and puzzled after a weeklong time out to South The United States when he told an airborne press conference that victims by no system came forward to accuse Barros of conceal-up.

Nonetheless this used to be now now not an ordinary letter, nor were the conditions beneath which it arrived within the Vatican.

Francis had named O’Malley, the archbishop of Boston, to head his Price for the Security of Minors in step with his credibility in having helped dapper up the mess in Boston after the U.S. intercourse abuse scandal exploded there in 2002. The commission gathered originate air experts to picture the church on conserving kids from pedophiles and educating church personnel about combating abuse and conceal-ups.

The four commission contributors who were on a various subcommittee devoted to survivors had flown to Rome specifically to consult with O’Malley regarding the Barros appointment and to utter Cruz’s letter. A statement issued after the April 12, 2015, assembly be taught: « Cardinal O’Malley agreed to pronounce the troubles of the subcommittee to the Holy Father. »

Price member Catherine Bonnet, a French shrimp one psychiatrist who took the picture of Collins handing the letter to O’Malley, acknowledged the commission contributors had decided to drop on Rome specifically when O’Malley and other contributors of the pope’s community of 9 cardinal advisers were assembly, in narrate that O’Malley might presumably save apart it at once into the pope’s palms.

« Cardinal O’Malley promised us when Marie gave to him the letter of Juan Carlos that he’ll give to Pope Francis, » she acknowledged.

O’Malley’s spokesman in Boston referred requests for comment to the Vatican. Neither the Vatican press assign of abode of enterprise, nor officials on the Pontifical Price for the Security of Minors, spoke back to calls and emails in quest of comment.

Nonetheless O’Malley’s great response to Francis’ defense of Barros and to his dismissal of the victims while he used to be in Chile, is perchance now better understood.

In a uncommon rebuke of a pope by a cardinal, O’Malley issued a statement Jan. 20 all the plot in which through which he acknowledged the pope’s phrases were « a source of big grief for survivors of sexual abuse, » and that such expressions had the enact of abandoning victims and relegating them to « discredited exile. »

A day later, Francis apologized for having demanded « proof » of wrongdoing by Barros, announcing he supposed merely that he wanted to see « proof. » Nonetheless he persisted to scream the accusations against Barros as « calumny » and insisted he had by no system heard from any victims.

Even when told in his airborne press conference Jan. 21 that Karadima’s victims had indeed positioned Barros on the scene of Karadima’s abuse, Francis acknowledged: « No one has advance forward. They haven’t equipped any proof for a judgment. Here is all moderately vague. It be one thing that can’t be licensed. »

He stood by Barros, announcing: « I am obvious he is harmless, » even while announcing that he idea of the testimony of victims to be « proof » in a conceal-up investigation.

« If someone might give me proof, I’ll be the main to listen, » he acknowledged.

Cruz acknowledged he felt cherish he had been slapped when he heard these phrases.

« I was upset, » he acknowledged, « and on the identical time I might presumably well now not assume that any individual so high up cherish the pope himself might presumably lie about this. »

___

This model corrects that the commission contributors’ time out to Rome used to be paid for by the commission, now now not themselves.

___

Vergara reported from Santiago, Chile. Yvonne Lee in Philadelphia and Jeffrey Schaeffer in Paris contributed.